Boston's Go-To Criminal Defense Law Firm
Aggravated Assault Defense Attorney in Boston
Felony Assault Defense Backed by Prosecutorial Experience
An aggravated assault and battery charge in Massachusetts is a felony. It carries the possibility of state prison, a permanent criminal record, and consequences that follow you long after any sentence ends. If you’re facing this charge in Boston, the attorney you hire needs to understand how prosecutors build these cases, not just how to defend against them.
I’m Brad Bailey. Before I became a defense attorney, I built serious felony cases as an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan, as a Middlesex County ADA, and as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Boston with the Organized Crime Strike Force and Drug Task Force. That experience on the prosecution side is what I bring to every defense. With over 100 superior court and federal trials across five decades of legal practice, I know how these cases are constructed, and where they can be challenged.
Contact Brad Bailey Law for a free consultation, available 24/7 by phone, in person, or virtually. Call (617) 500-0252 to speak with me about your case.
Aggravated Assault & Battery Under Massachusetts Law
Massachusetts treats assault and battery as two distinct offense levels. Simple assault and battery is a misdemeanor under M.G.L. Chapter 265, Section 13A(a), carrying up to 2.5 years in the house of correction and a fine up to $1,000. Aggravated assault and battery, defined under Section 13A(b), is a felony carrying up to 5 years in state prison and a fine up to $5,000.
The underlying elements of the offense are the same. What changes is the presence of one or more aggravating factors the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Because Massachusetts assault and battery law is rooted in common law rather than a statutory definition, the facts of each case carry significant weight in how the charge is analyzed and defended.
The Three Aggravating Factors
To charge the felony form of the offense under M.G.L. c. 265, §13A(b), prosecutors must establish at least one of the following:
Serious Bodily Injury
The injury must have resulted in permanent disfigurement, loss or impairment of a bodily function, organ, or limb, or created a substantial risk of death. Temporary pain or hospitalization alone doesn’t meet this standard. Medical records often aren’t enough on their own; prosecutors typically need expert medical testimony to establish the impairment element, and the defense can respond with its own expert.
Pregnant Victim
The prosecution must prove the defendant knew or had reason to know the victim was pregnant at the time of the offense. That knowledge element is often the most defensible part of this enhancement.
Active Restraining or No-Contact Order
The defendant must have known that an active vacate, restraining, or no-contact order was in effect against them at the time of the offense. Prosecutors bear the burden on the knowledge element here as well.
Prosecutors have discretion over which form to charge, which means a reduction from the felony aggravated form to the misdemeanor simple form during negotiations is sometimes achievable. It can make a decisive difference in the outcome.
Penalties & Collateral Consequences of a Felony Conviction
A conviction under M.G.L. c. 265, §13A(b) carries up to 5 years in state prison when prosecuted in Suffolk Superior Court, or up to 2.5 years in the house of correction at the district court level, plus fines up to $5,000. Beyond the sentence itself, a felony conviction creates a permanent record that can affect employment, professional licensing, housing eligibility, immigration status, and firearm rights. These consequences don’t expire. That’s why how the charge is resolved matters as much as the immediate result.
Defense Strategies for Aggravated Assault Charges in Boston
Because I spent years building cases like these as a prosecutor, I know where the evidence tends to be weakest and which arguments may be most likely to gain traction in Suffolk Superior Court or Boston Municipal Court. No two cases are the same, but the following defenses are frequently available.
- Challenge the serious bodily injury element: The impairment standard is fact-specific and subjective. Permanent disfigurement and substantial risk of death are frequently contested through defense medical expert testimony, and courts have dismissed this element on motion.
- Challenge the knowledge element: For the pregnant-victim and restraining-order enhancements, the prosecution must prove actual or constructive knowledge. This is often the most vulnerable part of the charge.
- Self-defense: A defendant who reasonably believed force was necessary to prevent imminent harm may assert self-defense, provided the force used was proportionate to the threat.
- Defense of others: Available where the defendant reasonably believed another person faced imminent harm and used proportionate force to prevent it.
- Misidentification: In cases that rest primarily on victim or witness testimony, challenging the reliability of the identification can be a viable path.
- Charge reduction: Even when outright dismissal isn’t achievable, negotiating the charge down to the misdemeanor simple form can significantly reduce long-term consequences.
- Suppression of evidence: If law enforcement obtained evidence through an unlawful search or seizure, a motion to suppress may remove it from the prosecution’s case entirely.
Early intervention matters. Before charges are formally filed, or before arraignment, defense counsel has the greatest opportunity to shape how the case develops. Waiting is rarely in a defendant’s interest.
Why Clients in Boston Choose Brad Bailey
My prosecutorial background isn’t a distant credential. I prosecuted serious felonies as an ADA in the Manhattan D.A.’s Office, the largest and busiest in the country, then as a Middlesex County ADA, and then as an AUSA in Boston. As an AUSA, I never lost a federal trial. That record belongs to my time as a federal prosecutor, and the knowledge it represents now works in my clients’ favor.
Credentials & Recognition
I hold a perfect 10.0 Avvo rating, an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell, and have been selected to Super Lawyers in 2004, 2006, 2007, and every year from 2014 through 2025. I’m recognized as a National Top 100 Trial Lawyer. My academic background includes Harvard and the University of Virginia School of Law. Licensed in Massachusetts since 1987, I’ve argued cases before the First Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Judicial Court, and the Massachusetts Court of Appeals. I know the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts and am respected by its judges and clerks.
The Team at Brad Bailey Law
My associates bring additional depth to every case. Daniel Reilly has been named to Rising Stars every year from 2021 through 2025. Patrick Garrity was selected to Rising Stars for 2025. I also serve as a regular guest analyst on Boston television and radio, including exclusive commentary for FOX’s Boston affiliate on cases of local and national significance.
Speak with an Aggravated Assault Defense Lawyer in Boston Today
If you’re facing an aggravated assault charge, the time to act is now. The decisions made in the earliest stages of a case shape every outcome that follows. I offer free consultations 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, by phone, in person, or virtually. I serve clients throughout Greater Boston and Cambridge.
Call (617) 500-0252 to speak directly with me about your case. Don’t wait to get experienced aggravated assault defense counsel on your side.
The Right Choice for Your Case
-
"We cannot recommend Brad Bailey more highly to anyone facing criminal charges in any court at any level."Anonymous
-
"Brad Bailey is one of the best attorneys I've had. He's easy to talk to and listens. Gives great advice and is ready to do work hard for a positive outcome."Krysten O'Donnell
-
"This is one smart and hard-working attorney. He is attentive and he was ready to fight any angle the prosecutors could come up with. His experience in the legal forum is significant and it shows."Canda Share
Free Consultation
See How Our Award-Winning Attorney Can Fight for YouNot Guilty Verdicts & Dismissals in Cases Across America
Click right for Brad Bailey Law & Associates major trial victories and significant case results.
-
Murder 1, Jury Trial
Not Guilty
Not guilty verdict after jury trial for client charged with murder.
- Aggravated (Gang) Rape, Jury trial Not Guilty
- Aggravated Rape of Child, forcible Rape of Child, Indecent A & B (Jury Trial) Not Guilty
- Forcible Rape, Jury Trial Not Guilty
- Arson Occupied Dwelling, Bomb Incendiary Device Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty
-
Perjury, Obstructing Justice, Federal Jury Trial
Not Guilty
Not Guilty: Perjury & Obstruction – Federal Jury Trial Victory.
- Obstructing Official Proceeding, Destruction of Records (Public Official) Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty
- Forcible Rape of Child, Jury Trial Not Guilty
- Conspiracy to Commit International Money Laundering, Defraud the USA, and Health Care Fraud (Federal Jury Trial) Not Guilty Verdicts
- Aggravated Rape of Child (2 counts), Rape of Child, Jury Trial Not Guilty Verdicts
- Aggravated Rape of Child, Rape of Child, Disseminating Harmful Material, Jury Trial Not Guilty Verdicts
- Trafficking in Cocaine, Jury Trial Not Guilty
- Falsification of Records, Fed Jurisdiction, Fed Jury Trial, NOT GUILTY VERDICT
- Child Rape (2 counts), Indecent A & B u 14 Not Guilty Verdicts
- Murder 1 Motion for New Trial GRANTED (after hearing) Verdict Reversed
- Forcible Rape, REVERSED ON APPEAL Dismissed
- Racketeering (RICO), REVERSED ON APPEAL (1st Cir) Dismissed
- Murder 1 [Adjutant Defense] Manslaughter Result (Hampden County)
- Murder 1 (Jury Trial) Hung Jury
- Conflict of interest/ False Pretense Fraud (Jury Trial) Hung Jury / Dismissed
- Aggravated Felonious Sexal Assault (NH), Motion for new trial GRANTED (after hearing) INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
- Aggravated Rape of Child, rape of Child, indecent A & B ( Teacher), Jury Trial MISTRIAL; HUNG JURY
-
Forcible Rape, (Jury Trial)
Not Guilty
Not guilty verdict after jury trial for client charged with rape.
- Murder 1 [Insanity Defense] Charges Reduced
- Aggravated Rape of Child (age-gap) And Child Rape, Jury Trial Hung Jury/Mistrial Declared
- Possession of Child Pornography [Felony] MOTION TO SUPPRESS GRANTED - Bristol Co. Charges and Case dismissed
- Aggravated Rape of Child, Rape of Child, Indecent A & B INDICTMENTS DISMISSED ( PRETRIAL)
-
Aggravated Rape of Child, Forcible Rape of Child (Jury Trial)
Hung Jury / Indictments Dismissed
Indictment Dismissed
- Aggravated Rape of Child, rape of Child, indecent A & B ( Teacher), Jury Trial MISTRIAL; 2d HUNG JURY
- Possession Child Pornography (Felony) Motion to Suppress- Essex Co. GRANTED (after hearing)
-
Rape (Dublin Firefighter)
HUNG JURY / MISTRIAL
Commonwealth v. Terence Crosbie
- Armed Carjacking INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
- Medicaid false Claims INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
- Murder 1 [Adjutant Defense] MANSLAUGHTER RESULT (Suffolk County)
- Indecent Assault and Battery on a Person Over 14 Charges Dismissed After Hearing & Oral Argument
- Loaded Firearm Charge, Carrying Without a License, No FID Card, and Class B Drug Possession All Criminal Charges Dismissed
- Conspiracy, Obstruction, and Misleading Investigators Felony Indictments Dismissed
-
Impressive Results Across the Nation
-
Team Approach to Handling Your Case
-
Experience as a Former Prosecutor
-
One of The Nation's Top Firms