Top
Misdemeanors

Boston's Go-To Criminal Defense Law Firm

Misdemeanor Attorney in Boston

Serious Defense for So-Called “Minor” Charges

If you’ve been charged, arrested, or summonsed for a misdemeanor in Boston, the first decisions may affect how your case develops. You may need to prepare for a clerk magistrate hearing or arraignment, preserve evidence, avoid unnecessary statements, and understand what the charge could mean for your record.

At Brad Bailey Law, I defend people facing criminal accusations in Boston and throughout Massachusetts. I offer free, confidential consultations to help you identify your next court date, understand the allegation, and evaluate your options before making consequential decisions.

If you’re worried about an upcoming court date or summons, Contact counsel now: Contact me online or call (617) 500-0252 to schedule a free consultation today.

What Counts as a Misdemeanor in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts generally treats an offense as a misdemeanor when the law doesn’t authorize imprisonment in state prison. Unlike states that divide misdemeanors into universal classes, Massachusetts relies on the statute defining each offense. That statute, along with the alleged facts and any applicable prior convictions, determines the classification and possible penalties.

Depending on the charge, potential consequences may include probation, fines, required programs, license effects, stay-away or no-contact conditions, or a sentence to a house of correction. The classification alone doesn’t reveal everything at stake. The same general charge can carry different implications based on alleged injury, property value, prior cases, or other statutory factors.

Why a Boston Misdemeanor Charge Deserves Serious Defense

A misdemeanor may sound like a slap on the wrist, but it can create or add to a Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) file containing court appearance and disposition information. Access depends on who requests it and what the law authorizes that person or organization to see.

Even when incarceration isn’t the central concern, a case can affect employment, housing, education, professional licensing, driving privileges, or family relationships.

A dismissal, nolle prosequi, continuance without a finding, and conviction can have different record consequences. A continuance without a finding is a disposition in which a defendant admits that sufficient facts exist for a guilty finding, but the court continues the case without entering that finding while the defendant complies with specified conditions. The charge may be dismissed after successful completion, but the court event can still have record implications.

For noncitizens, even a misdemeanor-level allegation or disposition may require separate immigration analysis. I identify that concern when evaluating defense options, but I don’t present criminal defense advice as a substitute for advice from qualified immigration counsel. Some Massachusetts records may eventually qualify for sealing, but eligibility depends on the offense, disposition, record, waiting period, and statutory requirements.

My Approach to Misdemeanor Defense

When I sit down with someone facing a misdemeanor, I start by listening carefully to how the charge arose and what matters most to them. I review the complaint, police reports, and available video or witness information, and I consider the person’s prior record and life circumstances. I want to understand not just what the Commonwealth claims happened, but also what a conviction or other disposition could mean for that client’s job, school, family, and immigration situation.

I examine whether the evidence supports every element of the charged offense. Depending on the allegations, that review may involve witness credibility, identification evidence, statements, searches and seizures, missing recordings, evidence preservation, or procedural defects. Information held by a client, witness, business, school, or property owner may also need to be identified before it’s lost.

My years as an Assistant District Attorney in New York County (Manhattan) and Middlesex County and as an Assistant United States Attorney in Boston gave me an inside view of how prosecutors build cases, assess evidence, and consider resolutions. I draw on that experience when evaluating weaknesses in the Commonwealth’s case, possible evidentiary challenges, and whether negotiations could advance the client’s goals.

Not every misdemeanor should go to trial. Depending on the facts and available options, a case may involve seeking dismissal, litigating a pretrial motion, discussing a continuance without a finding or another negotiated disposition, or preparing for trial. I explain the risks and potential benefits of each realistic path without promising a particular outcome.

The strategy for a student facing a parallel disciplinary process won’t necessarily fit a licensed professional, a driver whose livelihood depends on a license, or a noncitizen concerned about immigration consequences. My criminal defense trial strategy reflects the evidence, the law, and the interests that matter most to the individual client.

Former-Prosecutor Insight & Courtroom Experience

I studied at Harvard College and the University of Virginia School of Law, then served as a prosecutor in Manhattan, Middlesex County, and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts. I’ve handled thousands of criminal cases and tried more than 100 superior court and federal trials.

That courtroom experience informs how I evaluate even a so-called minor charge. Trial preparation requires close attention to what witnesses can establish, whether evidence is admissible, and where the prosecution’s theory may break down. It also allows me to discuss negotiations from a position grounded in the actual demands of proving a case.

I have handled matters in state and federal courts and have appellate experience before the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and the Massachusetts Appeals Court. That appellate work reinforces careful attention to legal standards, preserved objections, and the record created in the trial court.

Recognition & Client Priorities

Independent ratings and peer recognition also matter to many clients. I hold a 10.0 Superb Avvo rating and an AV Preeminent Martindale-Hubbell rating, and I have been selected to Super Lawyers in multiple years. Members of my firm, including Daniel Reilly and Patrick Garrity, have been recognized as Rising Stars.

Clients evaluating misdemeanor counsel often consider:

  • Prosecutor insight. My work in Manhattan, Middlesex County, and federal court in Boston helps me assess how the government may evaluate evidence and charging decisions.
  • Trial readiness. I prepare cases with the legal and factual detail required for contested hearings or trial when those proceedings are appropriate.
  • Individualized strategy. I don’t treat every misdemeanor as routine or recommend the same approach to every client.
  • Clear access. My firm offers free initial consultations, virtual consultations, and 24/7 availability.

I apply the same disciplined analysis to misdemeanor allegations that I bring to serious felonies. The potential penalties may differ, but the need to understand the evidence, procedure, and personal consequences remains important.

What to Expect in a Boston Misdemeanor Case

Massachusetts misdemeanor cases don’t all begin in the same way. Depending on the allegation and procedural posture, a matter may start with an arrest, an application for a criminal complaint, a summons to a clerk magistrate hearing, or a summons to arraignment. Boston cases may proceed in the Boston Municipal Court or a Massachusetts District Court based on jurisdiction and where the alleged conduct occurred.

Clerk Magistrate Hearing

For some complaint applications, a clerk magistrate hearing occurs before a formal criminal complaint issues. The clerk magistrate considers whether probable cause exists to issue the complaint. Because the hearing may offer an opportunity to address the allegation before a criminal case formally begins, preparation should account for the evidence, the client’s statements, and the risk that information presented could affect later proceedings.

Arraignment

At arraignment, the charge is addressed and a plea is entered or recorded. The court may consider release on personal recognizance, bail, and immediate conditions such as no-contact or stay-away orders. Criminal record information and available police statements may be exchanged at or before arraignment under applicable Massachusetts procedure, but discovery often continues afterward.

Discovery & Pretrial Proceedings

Discovery may include police reports, witness statements, recordings, photographs, video, and other material relevant to the allegations. I evaluate what has been produced, identify potentially missing evidence, and consider whether additional investigation or court action is needed.

Pretrial work may include:

  • Evidence review. I compare the available proof with every element the Commonwealth must establish.
  • Pretrial motions. A case may require motions concerning statements, searches, identification procedures, discovery, or admissibility.
  • Negotiations. I discuss possible resolutions in light of the evidence, direct penalties, and collateral consequences.
  • Trial preparation. I prepare the client for testimony decisions, court appearances, witness issues, and the demands of a judge or jury trial.

Trial

If a case doesn’t resolve during pretrial proceedings, it may proceed to trial before a judge or jury, depending on the charge and procedural choices. I prepare clients for each appearance, address the legal issues presented, and advocate for the resolution that fits their circumstances. No lawyer can guarantee a verdict or sentence, but careful preparation allows decisions to be based on the evidence and realistic options rather than assumptions.

Common Misdemeanor Situations I Handle

Whether an offense is treated as a misdemeanor depends on the statute charged, prior convictions, alleged aggravating facts, injury, property value, and other case-specific circumstances. I handle criminal defense matters involving the following allegations when supported by the facts of the case.

Common situations include:

  • Assault and battery allegations. These matters may arise from bar incidents, neighborhood disputes, or conflicts between people who know each other. An assault allegation can raise concerns about employment, education, and no-contact conditions in addition to potential criminal penalties.
  • Domestic and relationship-related accusations. These cases may involve no-contact orders, family relationships, housing, child-related concerns, or parallel proceedings. The surrounding personal circumstances must be considered alongside the criminal charge.
  • Larceny and shoplifting. The precise charge and classification may depend on the alleged conduct, property value, and prior history. Clients may also be concerned about how a dishonesty-related disposition could affect work or professional licensing, including allegations involving workplaces.
  • Operating under the influence and driving charges. A first-offense operating under the influence case or another driving allegation may create separate concerns involving a license, transportation, employment, or insurance.
  • Disorderly conduct and public-order offenses. These allegations can arise from crowded events, alcohol-related encounters, demonstrations, or disputes in public places. The available evidence and statutory elements still require close review.
  • College and campus incidents. A student may face both a criminal court case and a separate school disciplinary process. Statements or decisions made in one process may need to be considered in light of the other.

I look beyond the name of the offense and focus on what the allegation means for the individual client. A disposition that creates limited concern for one person could affect another person’s career, education, family responsibilities, or ability to remain in the United States.

Massachusetts Court Familiarity & Accessible Guidance

I’ve practiced criminal law in Massachusetts for decades. That background helps me evaluate court paperwork, applicable procedure, and the legal standards affecting a case.

Procedures, available sessions, prosecutor practices, and release conditions can vary by court and case. I don’t rely on a generic description of how misdemeanor cases “usually” end. I review the actual complaint, summons, court location, scheduled event, and known evidence before advising a client about likely next steps.

Communication is part of that preparation. I offer virtual consultations and am available 24/7. When a client receives a summons, court notice, or request for contact, I explain what the document requires and what information I need to assess the situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Could a First-Time Misdemeanor Lead to Jail?

It can, depending on the statute, alleged facts, prior record, and other case-specific factors. Possible outcomes may also include probation, fines, programs, or release conditions. I review the charged statute and available evidence before assessing exposure. I don’t promise a particular sentence or assume that every first-time case will be handled the same way.

How Much Does a Misdemeanor Attorney Cost?

Fees depend on the charge, court, evidence, anticipated motions, and whether the case may proceed to trial. I don’t use a one-size-fits-all figure. During a free consultation, I explain the fee structure and covered services for the particular case so that the prospective client can make an informed decision.

Discuss Your Misdemeanor Case Today

If you’re facing a misdemeanor charge, summons, or upcoming court date in Boston, a consultation can help you understand the allegation, identify the next procedural step, and evaluate possible strategies. Don’t assume the charge is inconsequential or wait until the last moment to review the paperwork and available evidence.

At Brad Bailey Law, I bring former state and federal prosecutorial experience and substantial trial experience to every misdemeanor case I accept. Consultations are free and confidential, virtual consultations are available, and I am available 24/7. You can reach out to discuss your circumstances and immediate concerns.

To discuss your misdemeanor case with Brad Bailey Law, call (617) 500-0252 today.

Read How We Helped People in Your Shoes

The Right Choice for Your Case

  • "We cannot recommend Brad Bailey more highly to anyone facing criminal charges in any court at any level."
    Anonymous
  • "Brad Bailey is one of the best attorneys I've had. He's easy to talk to and listens. Gives great advice and is ready to do work hard for a positive outcome."
    Krysten O'Donnell
  • "This is one smart and hard-working attorney. He is attentive and he was ready to fight any angle the prosecutors could come up with. His experience in the legal forum is significant and it shows."
    Canda Share

Free Consultation

See How Our Award-Winning Attorney Can Fight for You
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy
Featured Case Results
Only Hire an Attorney Who Gets Results
  • Murder 1, Jury Trial Not Guilty

    Not guilty verdict after jury trial for client charged with murder.

  • Aggravated (Gang) Rape, Jury trial Not Guilty
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, forcible Rape of Child, Indecent A & B (Jury Trial) Not Guilty
  • Forcible Rape, Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Arson Occupied Dwelling, Bomb Incendiary Device Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Perjury, Obstructing Justice, Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty

    Not Guilty: Perjury & Obstruction – Federal Jury Trial Victory.

  • Obstructing Official Proceeding, Destruction of Records (Public Official) Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Forcible Rape of Child, Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Conspiracy to Commit International Money Laundering, Defraud the USA, and Health Care Fraud (Federal Jury Trial) Not Guilty Verdicts
  • Aggravated Rape of Child (2 counts), Rape of Child, Jury Trial Not Guilty Verdicts
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, Rape of Child, Disseminating Harmful Material, Jury Trial Not Guilty Verdicts
  • Trafficking in Cocaine, Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Falsification of Records, Fed Jurisdiction, Fed Jury Trial, NOT GUILTY VERDICT
  • Child Rape (2 counts), Indecent A & B u 14 Not Guilty Verdicts
  • Murder 1 Motion for New Trial GRANTED (after hearing) Verdict Reversed
  • Forcible Rape, REVERSED ON APPEAL Dismissed
  • Racketeering (RICO), REVERSED ON APPEAL (1st Cir) Dismissed
  • Murder 1 [Adjutant Defense] Manslaughter Result (Hampden County)
  • Murder 1 (Jury Trial) Hung Jury
  • Conflict of interest/ False Pretense Fraud (Jury Trial) Hung Jury / Dismissed
  • Aggravated Felonious Sexal Assault (NH), Motion for new trial GRANTED (after hearing) INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, rape of Child, indecent A & B ( Teacher), Jury Trial MISTRIAL; HUNG JURY
  • Forcible Rape, (Jury Trial) Not Guilty

    Not guilty verdict after jury trial for client charged with rape.

  • Murder 1 [Insanity Defense] Charges Reduced
  • Aggravated Rape of Child (age-gap) And Child Rape, Jury Trial Hung Jury/Mistrial Declared
  • Possession of Child Pornography [Felony] MOTION TO SUPPRESS GRANTED - Bristol Co. Charges and Case dismissed
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, Rape of Child, Indecent A & B INDICTMENTS DISMISSED ( PRETRIAL)
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, Forcible Rape of Child (Jury Trial) Hung Jury / Indictments Dismissed

    Indictment Dismissed

  • Aggravated Rape of Child, rape of Child, indecent A & B ( Teacher), Jury Trial MISTRIAL; 2d HUNG JURY
  • Possession Child Pornography (Felony) Motion to Suppress- Essex Co. GRANTED (after hearing)
  • Rape (Dublin Firefighter) HUNG JURY / MISTRIAL

    Commonwealth v. Terence Crosbie

  • Armed Carjacking INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
  • Medicaid false Claims INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
  • Murder 1 [Adjutant Defense] MANSLAUGHTER RESULT (Suffolk County)
  • Indecent Assault and Battery on a Person Over 14 Charges Dismissed After Hearing & Oral Argument
  • Loaded Firearm Charge, Carrying Without a License, No FID Card, and Class B Drug Possession All Criminal Charges Dismissed
  • Conspiracy, Obstruction, and Misleading Investigators Felony Indictments Dismissed
Brad Bailey Is One of the Most Experienced Criminal Defense Firms in Boston Boston's Go-To Law Firm
  • Impressive Results Across the Nation
  • Team Approach to Handling Your Case
  • Experience as a Former Prosecutor
  • One of The Nation's Top Firms