Top
Drug Crimes

Boston's Go-To Criminal Defense Law Firm

Boston Drug Crime Attorney 

Arrested? Call Us Today – (617) 500-0252

A drug charge in Massachusetts can mean substantial jail time, heavy fines, and collateral consequences that follow you for years. I know exactly how the government builds these cases because I built them. As a former Assistant U.S. Attorney in Boston, I served first on the Organized Crime Strike Force and then on the Drug Task Force (OCDEFT), the unit responsible for prosecuting the most serious federal drug offenses in this district. That inside knowledge is what I bring to your defense.

I’ve never lost a federal trial, and over five decades of practice across state and federal court I’ve handled hundreds of serious criminal cases at every level. If you’ve been charged with possession, distribution, trafficking, a prescription drug offense, or a federal drug crime, the time to act is now.

Schedule your free consultation today. Call (617) 500-0252 to speak with a Boston drug crime attorney. Free, confidential consultations are available 24/7, including virtually.

Drug Charges I Defend

The earlier you have defense counsel, the more options you have. If you’ve been charged with a drug crime or want to discuss a matter involving drugs, contact me now. I defend clients facing:

Penalties for Drug Crimes in Massachusetts

A conviction carries consequences well beyond the courtroom. In addition to jail time and fines, it can cost you your job, affect housing applications, and put professional licenses at risk. Prescription drug charges can be especially damaging in fields subject to regulatory oversight.

Several factors shape the severity of a drug conviction in Massachusetts:

  • Type and Quantity of Drug: Massachusetts law distinguishes between substances and quantities, directly affecting sentencing ranges.
  • Prior Criminal History: Repeat offenses carry stricter penalties under state law.
  • Intent to Distribute: Distribution charges carry heavier consequences than simple possession.
  • Location of Offense: Crimes near schools or certain public places may trigger enhanced penalties under Chapter 94C of the Massachusetts General Laws.

Common penalties for drug crimes in Massachusetts include:

  • Prison time: Sentences vary by offense and substance.
  • Fines and court fees: Financial penalties escalate for repeat offenses.
  • Probation: Courts may impose supervised release in addition to, or instead of, incarceration.
  • Mandatory drug education or treatment: Some convictions require court-ordered treatment programs.
  • Loss of professional licenses or certifications: A conviction can end or severely disrupt a career in any regulated profession.

Massachusetts State Drug Penalties Under Chapter 94C

Most Massachusetts state drug offenses are prosecuted under Chapter 94C of the Massachusetts General Laws. Penalties depend on the nature of the offense, the defendant’s criminal history, and the type and quantity of the controlled substance involved. While weight, substance, and proof of intent to distribute typically drive sentencing, first-time offenders face significant jail time even for straight possession.

For example:

  • First-time heroin possession: up to 2 years in jail.
  • First-time cocaine possession: up to 1 year.
  • Second heroin possession conviction: mandatory 2½ to 5 years in prison.
  • Second cocaine possession conviction: mandatory up to 2 years in jail.

Federal Drug Penalties Under Title 21

Federal drug offenses are prosecuted under Title 21 of the United States Code. As with state offenses, penalties are primarily driven by the substance involved and its weight or quantity. Convictions for distribution, possession with intent to distribute, and conspiracy are calculated through drug conversion tables in the federal sentencing guidelines, which produce advisory sentencing ranges.

Statutory mandatory minimums apply on top of those guidelines. Distribution of 1 kg or more of heroin or 5 kg or more of cocaine triggers a mandatory 10-year sentence. Possession of 280 grams or more of crack cocaine, 50 grams or more of methamphetamine (or 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine), or 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana also carries a mandatory 10-year minimum.

Drug Defense Strategies in Massachusetts & Federal Court

My time on the Drug Task Force (OCDEFT) means I understand exactly how federal agents and prosecutors construct drug cases: what they look for, how they document it, and where the vulnerabilities are. With more than 100 superior court and federal trials behind me, I apply that knowledge systematically to every case I take.

Defense strategies I evaluate in every drug case include:

  • Motion to Suppress Evidence: A motion to suppress challenges whether law enforcement obtained evidence through a constitutionally valid search and seizure. If granted, suppressed evidence is excluded and charges may be reduced or dismissed entirely.
  • Challenging Confidential Informants: Confidential informants are common in drug prosecutions and frequently have criminal records and personal incentives to provide information. Their credibility and the reliability of their tips are viable, and often productive, defense targets.
  • Title III Wiretap Intercepts: In federal cases, the government may use Title III of the Federal Wiretap Act to intercept communications. Challenging whether those intercepts were lawfully authorized and executed is a central tool in federal drug defense.
  • Drug Lab Analyst Testimony: Massachusetts has documented cases of drug lab analyst misconduct, including falsified test results. Challenging the chain of custody and the reliability of analyst testimony is a recognized, and sometimes decisive, defense approach.
  • Lack of Knowledge, Intent, or Control: Depending on the facts, available defenses include lack of knowledge or intent to possess, entrapment, and lack of constructive control over drugs found near the defendant.

Why Federal Drug Defense Requires Its Own Experience

Federal drug charges differ from state charges in ways that matter at every stage. Familiarity with the United States Sentencing Guidelines, applicable enhancements, relevant conduct considerations, post-release penalties, and available sentencing relief mechanisms is essential. So is understanding how federal narcotics charges affect pre-trial release and detention, which operates differently from state practice. Unlike state court, sentencing entrapment remains a viable argument in federal court.

Having served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney on both the Organized Crime Strike Force and the Drug Task Force (OCDEFT) in Boston, and having never lost a federal trial, I bring direct knowledge of how these prosecutions are built and where they can be challenged. The judges and clerks of the federal court in Boston know me, and I know them.

What Happens After a Drug Arrest in Boston

After a drug arrest, most people don’t know what to expect next. The steps that follow move quickly, and decisions made early in the process can shape everything that comes after.

Following arrest, you’ll typically be taken to a local police station for booking and fingerprinting. Your first court appearance will usually be an arraignment at a local court such as Boston Municipal Court, where charges are formally presented and bail is addressed. The decisions made at arraignment, including requests for release, bail amount, and pre-trial conditions, directly affect how your defense takes shape.

Key stages after a drug arrest in Boston:

  • Booking and bail: After arrest, you’ll be processed and bail will be addressed, sometimes immediately, sometimes at a hearing. Having counsel present can make a meaningful difference.
  • Arraignment: Your first appearance before a judge. Charges are formally presented and pleas are entered. Representation at this stage can protect your options and limit early missteps.
  • Pre-trial hearings and motions: Before trial, I can pursue suppression of evidence, discovery requests, and arguments for dismissal. Strategic motions at this stage can fundamentally alter the direction of the case.

With more than 100 superior court and federal trials, I bring courtroom depth to every stage from arraignment through verdict.

Why Clients Choose Brad Bailey Law for Drug Defense

Facing a drug charge, you need a drug defense lawyer in Boston who knows federal court from the inside and has the trial record to back it up. I hold a perfect 10.0 Superb rating on Avvo and an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell. I’ve been selected to Super Lawyers every year from 2014 through 2025 and recognized as a National Top 100 Trial Lawyer. My education at Harvard and the University of Virginia School of Law informs everything I do in court, and I serve as a television commentator for FOX television’s Boston affiliate on cases of local, regional, and national importance.

My team extends that depth further: Daniel Reilly has been selected to Rising Stars every year from 2021 through 2025, and Patrick Garrity was selected to Rising Stars in 2025. Together, we handle cases at the state and federal level, including appellate matters before the Federal First Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Judicial Court.

When you work with Brad Bailey Law, you can expect:

  • Thorough investigation and analysis of all evidence, including suppression issues and chain-of-custody challenges
  • Strategic negotiation to pursue reduced charges or minimized penalties where possible
  • Strong courtroom advocacy if your case goes to trial
  • Personalized attention to the specific facts of your situation
  • Free consultations, available virtually, with 24/7 availability

Call (617) 500-0252 or message us online to speak confidentially with a criminal defense attorney. Free consultations, available around the clock.


Helpful Resources

Commonly Asked Questions

What is Title 21 of the United States Code?

Title 21 of the United States Code is the federal law governing drug offenses. It covers narcotics, controlled substances, and other illegal drugs, and establishes the framework for federal prosecution of drug crimes.

What defense strategies are available if I’m charged with a drug crime?

Available defenses depend on the facts of your case, but common strategies include challenging the constitutionality of the search and seizure through a motion to suppress, arguing lack of knowledge or intent to possess or distribute, asserting lack of constructive control over drugs found, and raising entrapment. In federal cases, challenging Title III wiretap intercepts or attacking the credibility of a confidential informant can also be effective.

Do federal drug offenses carry mandatory minimum sentences?

Yes. Statutory mandatory minimums apply to certain federal drug offenses regardless of sentencing guidelines. Distribution of 1 kg or more of heroin or 5 kg or more of cocaine requires a mandatory 10-year prison sentence. Possession of 280 grams or more of crack cocaine, 50 grams or more of methamphetamine (or 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine), or 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana also carries a mandatory 10-year minimum.

How does Chapter 94C govern state drug charges in Massachusetts?

Most Massachusetts state drug offenses are prosecuted under Chapter 94C of the General Laws. Penalties depend on the nature of the offense, the defendant’s criminal history, and the type and quantity of the controlled substance involved. Weight and proof of intent to distribute typically drive sentencing, but first-time offenders face significant jail time even for straight possession charges.

Read How We Helped People in Your Shoes

The Right Choice for Your Case

  • "We cannot recommend Brad Bailey more highly to anyone facing criminal charges in any court at any level."
    Anonymous
  • "Brad Bailey is one of the best attorneys I've had. He's easy to talk to and listens. Gives great advice and is ready to do work hard for a positive outcome."
    Krysten O'Donnell
  • "This is one smart and hard-working attorney. He is attentive and he was ready to fight any angle the prosecutors could come up with. His experience in the legal forum is significant and it shows."
    Canda Share

Free Consultation

See How Our Award-Winning Attorney Can Fight for You
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy
Hire a Boston Criminal Defense Attorney Who Gets Results
Not Guilty Verdicts & Dismissals in Cases Across America

Click right for Brad Bailey Law & Associates major trial victories and significant case results.

  • Murder 1, Jury Trial Not Guilty

    Not guilty verdict after jury trial for client charged with murder.

  • Aggravated (Gang) Rape, Jury trial Not Guilty
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, forcible Rape of Child, Indecent A & B (Jury Trial) Not Guilty
  • Forcible Rape, Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Arson Occupied Dwelling, Bomb Incendiary Device Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Perjury, Obstructing Justice, Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty

    Not Guilty: Perjury & Obstruction – Federal Jury Trial Victory.

  • Obstructing Official Proceeding, Destruction of Records (Public Official) Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Forcible Rape of Child, Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Conspiracy to Commit International Money Laundering, Defraud the USA, and Health Care Fraud (Federal Jury Trial) Not Guilty Verdicts
  • Aggravated Rape of Child (2 counts), Rape of Child, Jury Trial Not Guilty Verdicts
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, Rape of Child, Disseminating Harmful Material, Jury Trial Not Guilty Verdicts
  • Trafficking in Cocaine, Jury Trial Not Guilty
  • Falsification of Records, Fed Jurisdiction, Fed Jury Trial, NOT GUILTY VERDICT
  • Child Rape (2 counts), Indecent A & B u 14 Not Guilty Verdicts
  • Murder 1 Motion for New Trial GRANTED (after hearing) Verdict Reversed
  • Forcible Rape, REVERSED ON APPEAL Dismissed
  • Racketeering (RICO), REVERSED ON APPEAL (1st Cir) Dismissed
  • Murder 1 [Adjutant Defense] Manslaughter Result (Hampden County)
  • Murder 1 (Jury Trial) Hung Jury
  • Conflict of interest/ False Pretense Fraud (Jury Trial) Hung Jury / Dismissed
  • Aggravated Felonious Sexal Assault (NH), Motion for new trial GRANTED (after hearing) INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, rape of Child, indecent A & B ( Teacher), Jury Trial MISTRIAL; HUNG JURY
  • Forcible Rape, (Jury Trial) Not Guilty

    Not guilty verdict after jury trial for client charged with rape.

  • Murder 1 [Insanity Defense] Charges Reduced
  • Aggravated Rape of Child (age-gap) And Child Rape, Jury Trial Hung Jury/Mistrial Declared
  • Possession of Child Pornography [Felony] MOTION TO SUPPRESS GRANTED - Bristol Co. Charges and Case dismissed
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, Rape of Child, Indecent A & B INDICTMENTS DISMISSED ( PRETRIAL)
  • Aggravated Rape of Child, Forcible Rape of Child (Jury Trial) Hung Jury / Indictments Dismissed

    Indictment Dismissed

  • Aggravated Rape of Child, rape of Child, indecent A & B ( Teacher), Jury Trial MISTRIAL; 2d HUNG JURY
  • Possession Child Pornography (Felony) Motion to Suppress- Essex Co. GRANTED (after hearing)
  • Rape (Dublin Firefighter) HUNG JURY / MISTRIAL

    Commonwealth v. Terence Crosbie

  • Armed Carjacking INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
  • Medicaid false Claims INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
  • Murder 1 [Adjutant Defense] MANSLAUGHTER RESULT (Suffolk County)
  • Indecent Assault and Battery on a Person Over 14 Charges Dismissed After Hearing & Oral Argument
  • Loaded Firearm Charge, Carrying Without a License, No FID Card, and Class B Drug Possession All Criminal Charges Dismissed
  • Conspiracy, Obstruction, and Misleading Investigators Felony Indictments Dismissed
Why Choose Us?
  • Impressive Results Across the Nation
  • Team Approach to Handling Your Case
  • Experience as a Former Prosecutor
  • One of The Nation's Top Firms